I was always of the my opinion that no matter what the result of the European Referendum the UK Parliament should have an input in how in the result of a LEAVE vote should be implemented and have the final say on triggering Article 50.
I did not understand why the Government did not do this and when it was challenged not to have accepted the ruling of the English High Court when they said this should be the case
Instead they went to the supreme court and the inevitable decision.
Instead they went to the supreme court and the inevitable decision.
So despite the howling of the right wing media, I don't see that this will really effect the fact that the UK will leave the EU only that the scrutiny will take a bit longer and might make some tweaks to a hard Brexit.
After all Mrs May could always trigger a vote of no confidence and call an General Election which probably see a host of new Xenophobic Tories/Ukip MPs being returned to Westminster.
In the long term however the judgement on Tuesday, that
"On the devolution issues, the court unanimously rules that UK ministers are not legally compelled to consult the devolved legislatures before triggering Article 50.May well prove to be more historic
"The devolution statutes were enacted on the assumption that the UK would be a member of the EU, but they do not require it.
"Relations with the EU are a matter for the UK government."
The ruling said the assembly and other devolved legislatures had no veto.
This means that the concept of "A union of equals" is a complete lie.
It also means that the elected Legislatures may have no say in Brexit but the unelected members of the House of Lords.
Despite Scotland voting against Brexit and doing so I believe largely because they did not think it would be in "their" Nations interest to do so,, Scotland has apart for the single Tory MP from Scotland no say in the Brexit negotiations.
Tony Blair once received t Banner headlines comparing Holy-rood to a parish council .
That is why I question the Federalist argument , it would have to have legislation giving each member nation a veto . Something which I believe would never be accepted in England.
God forbid the reaction of the Sun,Mail , or Telegraph if this was ever to occur.
Yesterdays ruling may well have buried "Union of Equals Argument" but the Federalist argument as well.
It may well have made Scottish Independence almost inevitable.
But what of Wales how long can we as Nation see our will vetoed by English MPs and even more absurdly Members of the House of Lords.
No comments:
Post a Comment