Saturday, 5 October 2019

Tories hold in Cardiff's Whitchurch and Tongwynlais by-election



Conservatives candidate Mia Rees has been elected to Cardiff council after winning the Whitchurch and Tongwynlais by-election with 36% of the vote on Thursday.

The result means the Conservatives have held onto the seat, with 1,544 votes, with the by-election being held for a councillor to be appointed following the death of Timothy Davies.


The wars has in the past been won by Labour and 


The other three council seats are held by Conservative councillors Linda Morgan, Mike Jones-Pritchard and Mike Phillips.

Whitchurch & Tongwynlais (Cardiff) result:
Whitchurch and Tongwynlais Btyelectioin 2019
Whitchurch & Tongwynlais - results
Election CandidatePartyVotes%
 Mia Rhiannon ReesWelsh Conservatives / Ceidwadwyr Cymreig154436%Elected
 Marc Alan PalmerWelsh Labour / Llafur Cymru119028%Not elected
 Dan AllsobrookPlaid Cymru / Party of Wales67416%Not elected
 Sian Anne DonneWelsh Liberal Democrats / Democratiaid Rhyddfrydol Cymru58814%Not elected
 David Peter GriffinThe Green Party / Plaid Werdd2486%Not elected
Voting Summary
DetailsNumber
Seats1
Total votes4244
Electorate12589
Number of ballot papers rejected9
Number of postal votes sent2494



There seems little to comfort any Party , though Labour's failure to recapture a seat they won in 2012 must be surely indicative of their failure to win a seat after nearly ten years of a Tory government .

Previous Election 2017
Whitchurch & Tongwynlais - results
Election CandidatePartyVotes%
 Michael James PhillipsWelsh Conservative Party Candidate / Ymgeisydd Plaid Geidwadol Cymru290511%Elected
 Timothy Hywel DaviesWelsh Conservative Party Candidate / Ymgeisydd Plaid Geidwadol Cymru290011%Elected
 Linda Lesley MorganWelsh Conservative Party Candidate / Ymgeisydd Plaid Geidwadol Cymru285611%Elected
 Michael Jones-PritchardWelsh Conservative Party Candidate / Ymgeisydd Plaid Geidwadol Cymru275310%Elected
 Hannah Rose BuckinghamWelsh Labour / Llafur Cymru270010%Not elected
 Marc Alan PalmerWelsh Labour / Llafur Cymru24889%Not elected
 Norman GettingsWelsh Labour / Llafur Cymru24619%Not elected
 Maliika KaabaWelsh Labour / Llafur Cymru22348%Not elected
 Mali RowlandsCardiff Plaid - Plaid Cymru Caerdydd9624%Not elected
 Daniel James John AllsobrookCardiff Plaid - Plaid Cymru Caerdydd9514%Not elected
 Glenys Marian EvansCardiff Plaid - Plaid Cymru Caerdydd8853%Not elected
 Julia Mary BurnsCardiff Plaid - Plaid Cymru Caerdydd8563%Not elected
 Lynne Barrett-LeeWelsh Liberal Democrats / Democratiaid Rhyddfrydol Cymru5402%Not elected
 Dominic EggbeerWelsh Liberal Democrats / Democratiaid Rhyddfrydol Cymru5162%Not elected
 Geraldine Helen NicholsWelsh Liberal Democrats / Democratiaid Rhyddfrydol Cymru3651%Not elected
 Usman Mahmood BukhariWelsh Liberal Democrats / Democratiaid Rhyddfrydol Cymru3121%Not elected


In 2012 Labour win all the seats


Election CandidatePartyVotes%
 Jonathan EvansWelsh Labour / Llafur Cymru252912%Elected
 Chris DavisWelsh Labour / Llafur Cymru245411%Elected
 Ben ThomasWelsh Labour / Llafur Cymru235411%Elected
 David GrovesWelsh Labour / Llafur Cymru229010%Elected
 Linda MorganWelsh Conservatives / Ceidwadwyr Cymreig220610%Not elected
 Timothy DaviesWelsh Conservatives / Ceidwadwyr Cymreig214410%Not elected
 Brian GriffithsWelsh Conservatives / Ceidwadwyr Cymreig20809%Not elected
 Michael Jones-PritchardWelsh Conservatives / Ceidwadwyr Cymreig20809%Not elected
 John RowlandsPlaid Cymru6413%Not elected
 Heulwen JonesPlaid Cymru6233%Not elected
 Ceri MorganPlaid Cymru6003%Not elected
 Dewi OwenPlaid Cymru5883%Not elected
 Paul AtkinsGreen Party / Plaid Werdd4952%Not elected
 Joyce LenternWelsh Liberal Democrats / Democratiaid Rhyddfrydol Cymru2651%Not elected
 Matthew HarriesWelsh Labour / Llafur Cymru2331%Not elected
 Ruth AbbottWelsh Liberal Democrats / Democratiaid Rhyddfrydol Cymru2261%Not elected
 Mark ReesWelsh Liberal Democrats / Democratiaid Rhyddfrydol Cymru1831%Not elected
Voting Summary
DetailsNumber
Seats4
Total votes21991
Electorate12970
Number of ballot papers issued5894
Number of ballot papers rejected52
Turnout45%

Friday, 4 October 2019

Locum MP" is to provide maternity cover for pregnant MP

The UK's first "locum MP" is to provide maternity cover for pregnant MP Stella Creasy in her constituency in what looks an idea that  should be common place.
The BBC report that
"An advert says the role has an annual salary of £50,000 pro rata and is "rooted in Walthamstow not Westminster".
The "locum MP" will cover constituency work over seven months and will not sit in the Commons or vote.

Ipsa - the body which regulates MPs' pay - says it provides extra funding for all MPs' offices to cover absences.
MPs themselves are paid in full for the whole period of leave.
The locum MP will represent Labour MP Ms Creasy - who has previously spoken out about the maternity rights of MPs - in constituency surgeries, at events and visits and will answer queries from constituents.
'
Locum is a word most often used in the medical profession to describe a doctor who is covering the duties of another physician while they are ill or absent from work for some other reason.
The "locum MP" advert says in "the last few years alone" Ms Creasy, who represents Walthamstow, in North London, has answered more than 133,000 queries, in addition to her staff.
It adds that the role will begin in November and will "play a key role" in ensuring Ms Creasy's campaigns progress until May 2020.
She will be represented in Parliamentary votes via a proxy - an MP who is allowed to vote on a colleagues' behalf.
MPs have previously arranged unofficial cover for their constituency work through their staff or colleagues.
Ms Creasy said: "If the place that makes the law doesn't recognise the value of ensuring cover for the duties of MPs, then how can it advocate for the millions of parents across the country worried that if they take time out to care for newborn children they will suffer?
"As yet Parliament has still to get its act together to come up with a policy on this area and has not yet even begun to consult on the issue as promised, but this post means residents in Walthamstow can be confident that when my child is born they will still have someone to take up their cases with ministers, local public services and an advocate for the causes they care about."
'Modernise rules'
In June, Ms Creasy wrote in the Guardian that she was being "forced to choose between being an MP and a mum" because Ipsa does not automatically provide paid cover for MPs on parental leave.
Responding to the general issue rather than Ms Creasy's specific case, Ipsa's chairwoman Ruth Evans said: "To provide MPs with extra money, Ipsa asks for an explanation to be provided of how the additional money would be spent.
"We support proposals to allow maternity cover for MPs, and this would be for the House of Commons to take forward.
"In the last few years, we have more than doubled the funding available for MPs' dependants to support family life and will continue to strive to modernise our rules."
In January, MPs backed a year-long trial to allow MPs who were about to give birth or had recently become a parent to nominate another MP to vote on their behalf in the Commons.
Ipsa said that during the pilot it will pre-approve any applications for staff cover for MPs' parliamentary functions during their period of parental leave - and then consider creating a new budget to put the scheme on a permanent footing.
The debate over Parliament's rules was reignited earlier this year when Labour MP Tulip Siddiq delayed a Caesarean section to attend a vote on Theresa May's Brexit deal.
Later that month, the Hampstead and Kilburn MP became the first to vote in the Commons by proxy".

 In nearly all sectors of work it is common for temporary cover to be taken on to cover those on Maternity Leave and Walthamstow a major district in North East London and is part of the London Borough of Waltham Forest. It is located 7.5 miles (12.1 km) North East from Charing Cross. is close to Westminster but difference if it was Orkney & Shetland and this should become common place practise.

We often fail to recognise the amount of consituency work outside parliament and Y Senedd and the people need to see that they can have access it.

I am not sure if it should be extended to Westminster itself though surely Proxy voting should become the norm when  a MP is incapacitated through illness as well as taking incapacity leave.

The sight of serious ill MPs being delivered by ambulance to take part in a crucial vote  is an appalling indication of our democratic system.


Incidentally I believe that that If an MP was to die in the Houses Parliaments it would not be registered as  such due to our arcane laws.


Thursday, 3 October 2019

Leanne Wood censured for standing up to bigotry.

It was hardly unexpected that former Plaid Cymru leader Leanne Wood has been censured by her fellow AMs after tweeting a blogger calling him an “arsehole”..
To be fair to the AMs who voted to do this , they were rather tied by rules  which understandably are set to moderate AMs behaviour but in this case  seems to  be a victory for bigotry.
The AM for Rhondda was reported to the Standards Commissioner by an unnamed person who complained Ms Wood had breached the Code of Conduct for Assembly Members.

The tweet was directed at blogger Jac' o' the North after he tweeted a screenshot of the personal Twitter profile of Delyth Jewell - then newly-announced to be Plaid's successor to  the late Steffan Lewis   - and quoted part of her biography which read "women’s rights and international development’.”
His comment added: “God help Plaid Cymru."
At 9.37pm that night, Ms Wood responded "Do you have to be an arsehole all the time? Have a day off".
The politician said she was defending Ms Jewell after seeing “another case of bullying and intimidation of a young woman entering politics”.
Ms Wood had said that she had a long history with the blogger and that his blogs “often contain disparaging comments about women and minorities as well as Plaid Cymru, which are seemingly his pet hates”.
“I defend freedom of speech but there are limits to this and Jones frequently crosses the line and regularly writes untruths.”
Standards Commissioner Sir Roderick Evans investigated and said that the views – whether she agreed with them or not - “were views which a political commentator/blogger was entitled to hold and express”.
 In her speech to colleagues in the Senedd, Ms Wood said: "I may have a reputation for being robust in my response to trolls and bullies online but I do not normally engage in language which some may consider to be unparliamentary."This is the first time I have ever called someone an arsehole on social media and whilst I cannot promise that I won’t swear on social media ever again – I can understand why on receiving a complaint, the Standards Commissioner felt unable to be seen to be condoning the use by an assembly member of what he considers to be an offensive word."
 But she said, the case raised a number of questions.

She said: "It would not be honest or right for me to issue an apology because this is much more than just a case of swearing on Twitter".
Ms Wood told colleagues: "I decided that the best way to stand up to that bully was to use language he would be sure to understand.
"It’s not language I would normally use but sometimes, when standing up to bullies, you have to deploy whatever strategies you deem necessary.
"There is something very wrong with an organisation’s complaints procedures when the people standing up to a bully – and so often we are women, people of colour or LGBT people calling them out -  that we are the people who get the complaints and who get censured."
AMs had to vote about whether to censure Ms Wood or not.
Conservative AM Andrew RT Davies told Ms Wood he had "a huge amount of sympathy for the situation that Leanne presented to the committee" as a number of AMs also receive abuse but he said "it is a fact that this institution set up a standards procedure that is clearly defined and that has a commissioner at its heart, who presents a report".

Brexit Party AM David Rowlands said: "The refusal of any Assembly Member to accept the findings of the Standards Committee is completely reprehensible because it means that the code of conduct becomes obsolete. We would, in fact, practise being a rule-less Assembly. We must remember that the whole of the Assembly voted to introduce this code of conduct."
I am sure AMs will bear Mr Rowlands word in a future behaviour isies with his colleagures.


Prehaps the best speech came from Labour's Lynne Neagle defended Ms Wood saying while they were not political allies "her reaction was human, instinctive and protective".

She said: "As recently as last year, an Assembly Member, not a blogger or a commentator, but an elected Member, produced a sexist, deeply insulting video about a woman he works with.
"A councillor in my own borough, who actually chaired the safer communities committee at the time, repeatedly referred to refugees as 'rape-fugees' on Facebook.
"The friends and colleagues of the Prime Minister say he has a woman problem.
"He refers to Muslim women as 'letterboxes', an intervention that preceded a 375 per cent rise in Islamophobic incidents. The Prime Minister used the death of Jo Cox to make a flippant point about Brexit, an outburst that moved MPs to tears, not because they are women or weak, but because they mourn their friend and feel genuine fear for their own safety. The Prime Minister's own words are being used in death threats against women MPs."Can I tell you the two things that connect the Prime Minister, the councillor and that Assembly Member? They are all men and none of them were censored.
"And are we really getting ready to censor Leanne Wood for a one-word outburst - a politician whose opinions on gender issues and immigration have earned her death threats and daily abuse that require police intervention? Really - she’s the bad guy in all this?"
 
Royston Jones who blogs under the name Jac' O' the North  strenuously denied the claims made by Ms Wood in a statement provided to BBC Wales.
"My remark about Delyth Jewell was a reference to her background in the third sector, an area far too dominant in Welsh life," he said.
"I am no misogynist, ask any woman who knows me, but in the world of Leanne Wood any criticism of a female politician or a woman in business, etc, is misogyny."
The blogger said he had "never attacked gay people, trans people, disabled people. If Wood claims I have, then let her provide the evidence.
"Because my blog is read by many people this makes me a target for the left in Plaid Cymru and beyond."

The  reaction of Ma Wood who it should be remembered was still grieving after the death of Steffan Lewis  tweeted a screenshot of the personal Twitter profile of Delyth Jewell - then newly-announced to be Plaid's successor to the late Steffan Lewis and wrote "women’s rights and international development’. God help @Plaid Cymru."


At the time I wrote 0n this Blog  that if he had done any real research  then they would find ironically that Delyth Jewell  won the Overall Researcher of the Year award at Westminster. in  2014 whilst working for the then Plaid MP on his stalking bill

The panel of judges, made up of MPs, peers and the National Chairman of the Federation of Small Businesses which sponsors the event, said that her work on the stalking bill “went far beyond what would be asked of a researcher”.



In fact she's holding two trophies, because she also won the award for Crossbench or Other Parties’ Researcher of the Year.
They might realise that such an award out of hundreds of researchers some of who may well be now MP's or future ones is a huge accomplishment.
Plaid are very lucky to see someone step in the shoes of a a AM who was renown in the Siambr for the quality of his research.
At 9.37pm that night, Ms Wood responded "Do you have to be an arsehole all the time? Have a day off".

You can argue that Rules are Rules , but why should they protect misogynist  (for Royston Jones is one) .

He can carry on with his  views  and whilst I can refer to him as an arsehole it is strange that those he attacks can not.


A total of 37 AMs backed the sanction, with 12 voting against it.
Most Labour AMs joined the Conservatives and Brexit Party in supporting the censure, while Plaid, UKIP, Neil McEvoy and Labour's Lynne Neagle voted against the reprimand.
Four AMs - Labour's Jenny Rathbone and Vaughan Gething, Lib Dem Kirsty Williams and independent Michelle Brown - abstained on the Senedd vote.

Wednesday, 2 October 2019

Why do Unionists want a bilingual name instead of a only Senedd?



Whenever there is ever a hint of an upsurge in support for Independence the Unionist Party in Wales  turn to attacking any move to promote Cymraeg.

So it's  no surprise that they now want to to give the National Assembly for Wales a new bilingual name instead of a only Senedd.


Former first minister Carwyn Jones has tabled an amendment to the bill - favouring a bilingual name - "Senedd Cymru" and "Welsh Parliament".
He told Newyddion 9 the Welsh Government supports his amendment.
A Welsh Government spokesman said: "The government regularly works with backbenchers to bring forward amendments to improve legislation."
The vote is due to take place on 9 October.
Carwyn Jones said a bilingual name should be given to the legislature "at least" on a temporary basis, so everyone understands what the institution does.
Andrew RT Davies is another AM who opposes a Welsh-only name.
"There's always discussions going on where common ground can be found because, to get an amendment through, you have to have a majority vote," he said."I believe such discussions are being undertaken. This shouldn't be a controversial choice, this is ultimately, respecting the legislation that's in place to protect both the Welsh language and the English language."This is a parliament - senedd - both words are perfectly acceptable in most people's minds here in Wales."
Mr Davies seems to be trying to gain the mantle of Unionist  in Chief since steping down as Tory leader in what I wil now only refer to as Y Senedd 
AMs agreed the General Principles of the Senedd and Elections (Wales) Bill in July.
There were 42 for, no abstentions and nine against.
It is understood the First Minister, Mark Drakeford, told Cymdeithas yr Iaith Gymraeg, he favours a Welsh-only name.
Plaid Cymru also wants a Welsh-only name as the Welsh language "belongs to all people in Wales."
An Assembly Commission spokesman said Presiding Officer Elin Jones supports a Welsh-only name too.
Cymdeithas yr Iaith said: 
"It's a definite concern that a number of the arguments used against a Welsh-only name are patronising to the hundreds of thousands of people in Wales who support the language but cannot speak it.
"Many people already call the institution the 'Senedd' - just as they proudly sing the Welsh words of our national anthem. Everyone, from every background, has the right to celebrate the uniquely Welsh things, and no-one has the right to tell non-Welsh speakers otherwise."By giving the Senedd an English name too, it will inevitably normalise that name and undermine the use of the Welsh name."
Cymdeithas are right  the Unionist supporting the amendment fear that use of Senedd will lead to all the people of Wales identifying the legislature as ours.

They know that the English Language Media which have a problem with refering to the Parliament in Dublin as Dáil Éireann or simply Dáil   or the head of government Leo Varadkar as Taoiseach, which none intherepublic has a problem with pronouncing.

We should all use Senedd in any platform including when liaising  with the London Media  to see that it becomes common usage.

e..


There is a precedent  tor this


The 1953 Royal Badge of Wales
In 1807, the red dragon on a green mount was adopted as the Royal Badge of Wales,[2] and on 11 March 1953[9] the motto Y Ddraig goch ddyry cychwyn ('The red dragon gives impetus' or 'The red dragon leads the way') was added, a line from the poem by Deio ab Ieuan Du. The badge was the basis of a flag of Wales in which it was placed on a horizontal white and green bicolour. However, the flag was the subject of derision, both because the tail pointed downwards in some iterations and because the motto was a potential double entendre, used in the original poem to allude to the penis of a copulating bull. In 1959, government use of this flag was dropped in favour of the current flag[ at the urging of the Gorsedd of Bards.[16] Today the flag can be seen flying from the Senedd in Cardiff, and from Welsh Government buildings.




It is Our Senedd and if we want it to establish it in the minds of our people we should call it as such.


Tuesday, 1 October 2019

No Lord Carwyn?. However why not get rid of the lot of them.

It seems that it may take awhile before we see Lord Carwyn of Pen y Bont yr Ogwr, taking hsi seat on the red benches in the house of Lords.

Wales Online have reported that 
"A plan to nominate former First Minister Carwyn Jones for a peerage has been shelved while inquiries continue into his treatment of the late Carl Sargeant, we can reveal.
It was originally mooted that Mr Jones should be included in Theresa May's resignation honours list, published earlier this month, but we understand his name did not appear after the conclusion was reached that it would be inappropriate to nominate him before all the inquiries relating to his treatment of Mr Sargeant have been concluded.

In July, an inquest into Mr Sargeant's death concluded that he had  taken his own life in  November 2017, four days after he was dismissed from his post as Cabinet Secretary for Communities and Children following unspecified allegations of sexual harassment that he denied.
In response to an order made by Mr Gittins at the conclusion of the inquest, the Welsh Government has introduced new procedures for supporting Ministers after they are sacked.
An inquiry to be undertaken by Paul Bowen QC into Mr Jones' treatment of Mr Sargeant has still not got under way.
We have been told that Mr Jones’ name was put to the Cabinet Office by Labour and the Welsh Government for a steer on whether he would be accepted for a peerage by the House of Lords Appointments Commission.
According to a well-placed source the Cabinet Office said the nomination would not be approved.  The matter was not pursued further.
A senior Labour source said: "You are on safe ground to say that the peerage for Carwyn was blocked because the inquiries into his treatment of Carl Sargeant have not been completed.
"That doesn't mean he won't necessarily go to the Lords in the future."
A second senior Labour source suggested that the former First Minister's name was "discounted" because of concerns about inconsistencies in his evidence to the inquest.
 Vale of Clwyd Labour AM Ann Jones, the National Assembly's deputy presiding officer, gave evidence to the inquest disputing earlier testimony from Mr Jones that she had been appointed to a pastoral care role to help Mr Sargeant after he was sacked. Mr Jones has since said he made a mistake in his initial evidence.A spokesman for the Welsh Government would only say: “The awarding of peerages is a matter for the Prime Minister and the House of Lords Appointments Commission.”
The Cabinet Office said it did not discuss honours lists.
Carl Sargeant’s son Jack Sargeant, who succeeded his father as the Labour AM for Alyn & Deeside, said: “There remain so many unanswered questions over the former First Minister’s conduct. Until these are answered, any peerage would be disturbing, distressing and wholly
inappropriate.”
Mr Jones, who has said in several interviews since he announced he was standing down that he would like to go to the Lords, did not comment.
He stepped down as First Minister in December 2018 and will not seek re-election as Labour AM for Bridgend at the next Assembly election in 2021".
Quite frankly whilst  I think it would be inappropriate to raise Carwyn to the peerage unless he is at least partly vindicated, considering  Theresa May has been accused of “rotten” cronyism after handing out peerages, knighthoods and other honours to her closest aides, including her controversial former advisers Nick Timothy and Fiona Hill, who left office amid accusations of bullying behaviour it seems a bit rich to exclude Carwyn in the future.

The Guardian tells us

.Several financial backers were also rewarded with peerages, including David Brownlow, who has donated more than £2m to the Conservatives, including cash for May’s own Maidenhead office, and two other Tory donors, Rami Ranger and Zameer Choudrey. Another major Tory donor, Ehud Sheleg, who has given the party almost £3m, was given a knighthood.Olly Robbins, May’s EU adviser, who was loathed by Brexiters, and George Holingbery, her former parliamentary aide, were both made knight commanders of the order of St Michael and St George. It emerged on Monday that Robbins is to take a sabbatical holding a visiting fellowship at Oxford University before leaving the civil service to join Goldman Sachs’ investment banking division.
Nothing new here.


 In 1916 David Lloyd George replaced Herbert Asquith as Prime Minister at the head of a coalition government that relied heavily on the support of the Conservative Party. This resulted in a split in the Liberal Party between the Asquith Liberals or Squiffites and the Lloyd George or Coalition Liberals. Since the Asquith Liberals controlled the party and its funds, this left the Coalition Liberals in need of money, and the easiest ways of raising money for party funds was to sell honours.Now there was nothing new about the practice of selling honours, or indeed of using the funds as a means of party financing. This had been going on for some time, but by tradition such deals were made with a nod and a wink over a glass of port in the Carlton or Reform clubs. What distinguished the sale of honours under Lloyd George was the sheer scale of the operation and the brazen manner in which honours were offered for sale. Ostensibly handled by Lloyd George's Chief Whip Freddy Guest and his press agent William Sutherland, the operation was actually run by a former actor and theatrical impressario by the name of Maundy Gregory. Gregory had his own offices in Parliament Square and openly touted the sale of honours on official government letters that were sent out boasting of the "exceptional opportunity" on offer. There was even a published tariff with a knighthood being available for £10,000, a baronetcy for £30,000, with a peerage title costing upwards of £50,000.Between December 1916 and July 1922 an astonishing number of 1,500 knighthoods were awarded and Lloyd George similarly bestowed a total of 91 peerage titles within the same period, twice as many as had been created in the previous twenty years. Indeed Gregory, noting that there were men with cash to spare who couldn't quite afford a knighthood, specifically invented the Order of the British Empire to fill the gap in the market. As a result 25,000 people were 'given' the OBE over a period of four years and the 'honour' became so rapidly devalued that it was commonly known as the Order of the Bad Egg.
In the time honoured fashion Lloyd George appointed a Royal Commission to look into the whole matter, but rather craftily ensured that the terms of reference restricted the commission to only making recommendations as to future practice and thus excluded it from examining past conduct.6 In this manner Lloyd George managed to avoid any responsibility for the whole scandal, although this did little to arrest the declining fortunes of his government and he resigned in October 1922 and never saw office again.The Royal Commission published its report in November 1922 and the result was the establishment of the Political Honours Scrutiny Committee, to oversee those names put forward by the Prime Minister as worthy of receiving an honour, and the Honours (Preventions of Abuses) Act 1925 which made it an offence to accept a monetary reward in return for granting an honour.7None of the above has necesarily removed all trace of scandal from the British Honours system. Many have since commented on the number of occasions on which the gift of a large amount of money to a political party has been followed by the subsequent granting of an honour to the donee. This is of course entirely co-incidental and in no way indicates that deals have been done with a nod and a wink over a glass of Chablis at the Groucho Club

There is only one way to stop such abuses and that is to not  only abolish the House of Lords but peerages and knighthood. 

Why should we be expected to call anybody who is nothing but a corrupt or sexual predator My Lord or Sir as if they were better than us.