.They Claim that the best things come to those that wait . But not in this case. I received this Royal Mail delivered LibDen Election Communication today. It one of the most negative leaflets they have ever produced.
It supposed to be for the South Wales Central regional seats but you would find it be hard to work that out.
Completely monolingual (So much for equality for the Welsh Language) printed in Sheffield (So much for supporting Welsh Industry) it only barely mentions any candidates standing on the list, but is full of photos of La Pasionaria who although the party leader and I admit photogenic is not a candidate here.
Says virtually nothing on what the Libdems would introduce in the next Assembly but simply concentrates on attacking the previous governments record mainly on Education and Health . Which quite frankly no one one will ever be happy with .
But there is one clear example of the way this Party works . There is a photoshop of Airplane with th logo Labour Air claiming millions have been spent on flight subsides . Anyone familiar with Libdem Blogs in Wales woyld know that they have always sneered as this as being "Ieuam Air" to claim that the flight from North Wales to South was solely there to accommodate the Plaid leader.
Of course its likely there will be No Libdems AM's from North Wales so they will not be using i after May.
Clearly they think there are more votes in this if they associate this with Labour in this region, I wonder if there are examples of a similar leaflet with but the logo showing Ieaun Air in other parts of Wales.
This leaflet shows how desperate this Party is and why they deserve to lose not only Cardiff Central but fail to gain a Regional seat in South wales Central, Give you second vote to either Plaid or the Greens and not these opportunist.
This negative misleading leaflet shows just what a Nasty Party the Libdems are 0/10
Saturday, 30 April 2011
Friday, 29 April 2011
I'm a Repuplican get me out of here.
I'm off to the hills walking today to avoid the forelock tugging rubbish on the Television. My only fear is that it will not be a case of solitary complementation as there probably be hundreds doing the so thing. It will be worth it to avoid Huw Edwards what would Hywel Tefi have thought of his son mouthing such sycophantic claptrap?
Thursday, 28 April 2011
Election Communications?
With a week to go, I have yet to receive all the Election Communications I would have expected delivered by Royal Mail from the Parties standing in the Pontypridd Constituency and the South Wales Central Region with only are only three delivery days left. With most Postal Votes now completed.Unless the parties have made a special arrangement to see that their leaflets have been delivered earlier to those opting for a Postal Vote then these people may not see these communications until after they have voted. Perhaps the Parties should inquire from people when they have received the campaign leaflets. I would have thought most would have liked to get they message out at least 14 days before the election date
Mind you what I have received hasn't been very inspiring.
Conservatives,
Constituency Candidates Leaflet: English only says virtually nothing . Candidate looks like typical Tory Boy 2/10
Regional Leaflet: Bilingual bit sometimes different messages I Welsh and English Names candidates but seems to concentrate on their charity work. Shows Photoshop of Cameron with candidates and not leader Nick Bourne 4/10.
Regional Leaflet: Bilingual bit sometimes different messages I Welsh and English Names candidates but seems to concentrate on their charity work. Shows Photoshop of Cameron with candidates and not leader Nick Bourne 4/10.
Plaid,
Constituency Candidate: Fully Bilingual somewhat uninspiring but makes some policy statements but no real plans for future legislation (Which is what we backed a few months ago) easy to read 6/10.
Constituency Candidate: Fully Bilingual somewhat uninspiring but makes some policy statements but no real plans for future legislation (Which is what we backed a few months ago) easy to read 6/10.
Regional Leaflet: No leaflet by Royal Mail to date
.
.
Lib Dem,
Constituency Candidates Leaflet: Packed with very aggressive and negative politics Many Photos of candidate one of
Constituency Candidates Leaflet: Packed with very aggressive and negative politics Many Photos of candidate one of
which was on his Leaflet for the General Election last year 6/10 (would have been more if bilingual).
Regional Leaflet: .No leaflet by Royal Mail to date.
Regional Leaflet: .No leaflet by Royal Mail to date.
Labour,
Constituency Candidate: No leaflet by Royal Mail to date.
Constituency Candidate: No leaflet by Royal Mail to date.
Regional Leaflet::Fully Bilingual but only shows leader Carwyn Jones. Does not show or name candidates 5/10
Other: English only Newspaper delivered by Party supporters early in campaign. Doesn't actually say much about future policy ; 5/10
Canvassing: English only small leaflet 4/10.
UKIP,
No Constituency Candidates:
Regional Leaflet: English only . No candidates named concentrates on Anti-immigration Policy makes absolutely no contribution to future Assembly policies . 2/10.
Regional Leaflet: English only . No candidates named concentrates on Anti-immigration Policy makes absolutely no contribution to future Assembly policies . 2/10.
Green,
No Constituency candidates:
Regional Leaflet: Fully Bilingual ,concentrates on lead candidate but convincing: 7.5/10.
No Constituency candidates:
Regional Leaflet: Fully Bilingual ,concentrates on lead candidate but convincing: 7.5/10.
It seems that the referendum last March hasn’t really inspired our Political Parties to come up with imaginative Legislation for the Next Assembly which will be for 5 years and if Labour get a overall majority far from putting clear red water between the Senedd and Westminster will be ordered to keep legislation moderate and not be another GLC during the Thatcher years and a target for the right wing press. From Plaid’s rather bland campaign they to need to come up with fresh and imaginative ideas.
The other disappointing issue was the lack of Bilingualism(apart for Plaid) in the Individual Candidates leaflets . Strange they all supported the last Welsh Language act The Tories make a claim to
“Work towards one million Welsh speakers by 2031 and 1.5 million by 2051 in a truly bilingualand similarly haw can La Pasionaria call official status for the Welsh Language and still allow her Part to have English only campaign literature?.” and produce English only leaflets (Manifesto 2011). Wales
When I was a student in Aberystwyth all candidate for NUS posts had to have bilingual communications or be exclude from the poll .Perhaps the next Welsh Assembly can use its new powers to encourage parties to do so in Welsh elections though I would much prefer if they voluntary action and set an example for the rest of Wales.
Wednesday, 27 April 2011
So it's a referendum on the Con/Lib government then?
referendum As I've said in past post. I do not think AV is the answer and is no better than the current First Past the Post system and I intend to write a S in the Yes box to show my support for STV.
My views have not been changed by the actions of both the Yes and No camps .
Yesterday I received the NO leaflet (I still have not received the Yes one). ( I will be commenting on the delivery of election leaflets tomorrow)
As you can see part of the No campaign is an attack on the Libdems and the issue of Tuition fees.Despite the fact that the Tories would have implemented these fees if they had received a overall majority last May.
What they are apparently saying is "Punish Nick Clegg by voting NO.
But the Yes side are just as bad Yesterday Peter Mandelson Claimed that a Vote yes for AV would put David Cameron out of a job.
So both sides are saying , "Ignore the merits of either AV or FPTP and vote to embarrass thr Politician you most dislike".
Is this the way to run a democratic debate? Forget that this is a referendum on our electoral system and lets have one on the Party leaders.
Of course the same could be said of the Welsh Assembly elections where Labour are trying and succeeding in transforming it into a vote on the Con/Libdem coalition at Westminster.
The same will be true of the Local Council elections in England but it looks like Scotland will vote mainly on Scottish issues.
One of the reasons I support STV is that occasionally I feel sorry for good hardworking councilors of parties I would not normally vote for who lose their seats because the electorate want to give the government of the day a good kicking
Through STV Voters can have the opportunity to save those who despite their party affiliations have served their community and electorate by giving them a high ranking .
It would be a good idea if the next assembly look at the election system in Wales a start would be to introduce STV at local elections as has been done in Scotland.
My views have not been changed by the actions of both the Yes and No camps .
Yesterday I received the NO leaflet (I still have not received the Yes one). ( I will be commenting on the delivery of election leaflets tomorrow)
As you can see part of the No campaign is an attack on the Libdems and the issue of Tuition fees.Despite the fact that the Tories would have implemented these fees if they had received a overall majority last May.
What they are apparently saying is "Punish Nick Clegg by voting NO.
But the Yes side are just as bad Yesterday Peter Mandelson Claimed that a Vote yes for AV would put David Cameron out of a job.
Mandelson added:
"What I'm saying to my party is, think strategically. How is it best to collapse the coalition?"
So both sides are saying , "Ignore the merits of either AV or FPTP and vote to embarrass thr Politician you most dislike".
Is this the way to run a democratic debate? Forget that this is a referendum on our electoral system and lets have one on the Party leaders.
Of course the same could be said of the Welsh Assembly elections where Labour are trying and succeeding in transforming it into a vote on the Con/Libdem coalition at Westminster.
The same will be true of the Local Council elections in England but it looks like Scotland will vote mainly on Scottish issues.
One of the reasons I support STV is that occasionally I feel sorry for good hardworking councilors of parties I would not normally vote for who lose their seats because the electorate want to give the government of the day a good kicking
Through STV Voters can have the opportunity to save those who despite their party affiliations have served their community and electorate by giving them a high ranking .
It would be a good idea if the next assembly look at the election system in Wales a start would be to introduce STV at local elections as has been done in Scotland.
Monday, 25 April 2011
That will teach me to misquote Harold Wilson.
Only a hour after I last posted on the Welsh Assembly campaign for the Pontypriddd Constituency (below). I was amased to see that Libdem candidate Mike (Bandwagon Powell ) ,had bees arrested and bailed, and his computer equipment and a mobile phone have been taken by police.
According to the BBC website.this is over alleged harassment of aides to the local MP Labour Owen Smith The report claims that.
One can only wonder if this makes any change to the intentions of the voting public it probably depends on how much it covered and one suspects that Sub judice will mean those involved will not be communicating much more on this and what play either Party makes of it.
However from this Bloggers stance it shows that I was exaggeration when I said "a year was along time in Politics" and even Harold Wilsons "A week is along time in politics" seems mild after my post yesterday it seems, Just a hour is a long time in politics,
According to the BBC website.this is over alleged harassment of aides to the local MP Labour Owen Smith The report claims that.
"Welsh Labour confirmed that Allen Bevan and Gareth Mantle - aides to Labour MP Owen Smith - had complained to police, but said that they were not the only complainants".
It is understood one allegation centres around video footage of individuals being posted on the internet..Lib Dems claimed there had been "malicious" complaints about Mr Powell, who declined to comment.
One can only wonder if this makes any change to the intentions of the voting public it probably depends on how much it covered and one suspects that Sub judice will mean those involved will not be communicating much more on this and what play either Party makes of it.
However from this Bloggers stance it shows that I was exaggeration when I said "a year was along time in Politics" and even Harold Wilsons "A week is along time in politics" seems mild after my post yesterday it seems, Just a hour is a long time in politics,
Sunday, 24 April 2011
Sun appears to be shining on Labour in Ponty at least.
Pontypridd has as always been safe Labour seat.Well up till last year when the Libdem candidate Mike (Bandwagon) Powell ran them close.
General Election 2010: Pontypridd
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Labur Owen Smith 14,220 38.8 -15.4
Lib Mike Powell 11 ,435 31.2 +11.2
Cone Lee Gonzalez 5,932 16.2 +4.6
Plaid Ioan Bellin 2,673 7.3 -3.7
UKIP David Bevan 1,229 3.4 +0.8
SLP Simon Parsons 456 1.2 +1.2
Christian Donald Watson 365 1.0 +1.0
Green John Matthews 361 1.0
Majority 2,785 7.6
Turnout 36,671 63.0% -0.2
Labour hold Swing -13.
This was an impressive performance by the Libdems and Bandwagon in particular who has been nursing the constituency fo a long time and increased his pressure on Labour from the 2007 Assembly Election making Pontpridd a marginal seat
Party Candidate Votes %
Labr Jane Davidson 9,836 41.8
Lib Mike Powell 6,489 27.6
Plaid Richard Grigg 4,181 17.8
Cons Janice Charles 3,035 12.9
Majority 3,347 14.2
Turnout 23,541 41 %
But the signs are that "Bandwagon" is not going to repeat his onslaught . Labour have got their act together and as you can se in thee stronghold of Beddau have been getting their supporters showing their colours something they manifestly failed to do in the last two elections.
It's slightly deceptive, they seem to have concentrated on the main route through the Village and these are after all traditional Labour voters but these are also people who may well have failed to vote last time.
But it looks as if Labour "We can protect you from the Con/Libdem cuts is working.though it prehaps shows a weakness in that their attraction is that that they are not the Con/Libdem coalition.
What of the other Parties the Tories have never really campaigned in the Consistency and Plaid have somehow lost a deal of it influence here.
But they both may well actually Bbnefit from the perceived increase in Labour support.; Because if votrs find as I do Mike Bamdwagon's negative campaigning distasteful you might have been tempted to vote Labour to keep him out.
Have look on his take on the constituency on Subordinate Central where he attacks the Labour candidate but not his Polcies and makes the usual claim that he is an outsider.whilst also making a veiled attack on Mick Antoniw's integrity.
Bamdwagon is also responsible for one of the most dubious Bar charts ever produced by the LIbdems his campaign last year.
So I expect Labour to win comfortably and the only real interest is who will came second. A year is certainly a long time in politics.
Assembly Election 2011: Pontypridd
Party Candidate
Labour Mick Antoniw
Libdem Mike Powell
Cons Joel James
Plaid Ioan Bellin
Ind Ken Owens
General Election 2010: Pontypridd
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Labur Owen Smith 14,220 38.8 -15.4
Lib Mike Powell 11 ,435 31.2 +11.2
Cone Lee Gonzalez 5,932 16.2 +4.6
Plaid Ioan Bellin 2,673 7.3 -3.7
UKIP David Bevan 1,229 3.4 +0.8
SLP Simon Parsons 456 1.2 +1.2
Christian Donald Watson 365 1.0 +1.0
Green John Matthews 361 1.0
Majority 2,785 7.6
Turnout 36,671 63.0% -0.2
Labour hold Swing -13.
This was an impressive performance by the Libdems and Bandwagon in particular who has been nursing the constituency fo a long time and increased his pressure on Labour from the 2007 Assembly Election making Pontpridd a marginal seat
Party Candidate Votes %
Labr Jane Davidson 9,836 41.8
Lib Mike Powell 6,489 27.6
Plaid Richard Grigg 4,181 17.8
Cons Janice Charles 3,035 12.9
Majority 3,347 14.2
Turnout 23,541 41 %
But the signs are that "Bandwagon" is not going to repeat his onslaught . Labour have got their act together and as you can se in thee stronghold of Beddau have been getting their supporters showing their colours something they manifestly failed to do in the last two elections.
It's slightly deceptive, they seem to have concentrated on the main route through the Village and these are after all traditional Labour voters but these are also people who may well have failed to vote last time.
But it looks as if Labour "We can protect you from the Con/Libdem cuts is working.though it prehaps shows a weakness in that their attraction is that that they are not the Con/Libdem coalition.
What of the other Parties the Tories have never really campaigned in the Consistency and Plaid have somehow lost a deal of it influence here.
But they both may well actually Bbnefit from the perceived increase in Labour support.; Because if votrs find as I do Mike Bamdwagon's negative campaigning distasteful you might have been tempted to vote Labour to keep him out.
Have look on his take on the constituency on Subordinate Central where he attacks the Labour candidate but not his Polcies and makes the usual claim that he is an outsider.whilst also making a veiled attack on Mick Antoniw's integrity.
Bamdwagon is also responsible for one of the most dubious Bar charts ever produced by the LIbdems his campaign last year.
So I expect Labour to win comfortably and the only real interest is who will came second. A year is certainly a long time in politics.
Assembly Election 2011: Pontypridd
Party Candidate
Labour Mick Antoniw
Libdem Mike Powell
Cons Joel James
Plaid Ioan Bellin
Ind Ken Owens
Thursday, 21 April 2011
Greens show why we should have STV in Wales.
The Greens have produced their best (or worst) leaflet I've seen from them for the Assembly Election..
Best because it's professional and Bilingual (I suppose the Welsh is accurate) and well laid out.
Worst because they resort to negatice campaigning.
As you can see they are pointing out that Labour because of the amount pf constituencies they will win in South Wales Central they are unlikely to win a "Top Up" on the Regional List and the Greens then claim that it is a wasted vote. They can't claim this of the other "main" parties as Plaid, Conservatives and Libdem will all probably need a "Top up".
Hang on a minute! I was under the impression that the reason for the Regional list,was to Top up the vote of Parties that have fought constituencies and have not received the number of seats that the percentage of votes under PR would have entitled them.
So although I would welcome the election of a Green AM, it seems to me wrong that a Party that does not contest Constituencies should only stand in the regional list and then argue for another Parties top up votes in the way the Greens are doing .
It all means that they can fight relatively cheap elections and if they do not include the name of candidates on the leaflets can print them weeks before the election (probably cheaper) and not worry that a candidate may die or resign before the election nominations are in.
But although they are more professional they seem to have joined in the Bar Graph "we can win here" game although they seem to have mixed up the labels on the small.Bar Graph they show above .
The reality is that if a Green or UKIP member is elected to the Assembly it will not be in the true spirit of the idea of the "Top Up" and is another argument that as in Northern Ireland elections for the assembly should be under STV, in which the Greens can win seats on a more legitimate basis.
Best because it's professional and Bilingual (I suppose the Welsh is accurate) and well laid out.
Worst because they resort to negatice campaigning.
As you can see they are pointing out that Labour because of the amount pf constituencies they will win in South Wales Central they are unlikely to win a "Top Up" on the Regional List and the Greens then claim that it is a wasted vote. They can't claim this of the other "main" parties as Plaid, Conservatives and Libdem will all probably need a "Top up".
Hang on a minute! I was under the impression that the reason for the Regional list,was to Top up the vote of Parties that have fought constituencies and have not received the number of seats that the percentage of votes under PR would have entitled them.
So although I would welcome the election of a Green AM, it seems to me wrong that a Party that does not contest Constituencies should only stand in the regional list and then argue for another Parties top up votes in the way the Greens are doing .
It all means that they can fight relatively cheap elections and if they do not include the name of candidates on the leaflets can print them weeks before the election (probably cheaper) and not worry that a candidate may die or resign before the election nominations are in.
But although they are more professional they seem to have joined in the Bar Graph "we can win here" game although they seem to have mixed up the labels on the small.Bar Graph they show above .
The reality is that if a Green or UKIP member is elected to the Assembly it will not be in the true spirit of the idea of the "Top Up" and is another argument that as in Northern Ireland elections for the assembly should be under STV, in which the Greens can win seats on a more legitimate basis.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


