Saturday, 27 October 2018

So this is Brexit. An end to manufacturing.in the UK and especially Wales?



The Wasting Mule reports that

Leading Brexiteer Jacob Rees Mogg has urged the public to listen to a Cardiff economist who said Brexit would lead to running down the car industry “in the same way we ran down the coal and steel industries”.
The comments from Cardiff University’s Professor Patrick Minford have come under the spotlight after Mr Rees-Mogg praised him in a newspaper article.In 2012, he told MPs on Westminster’s Foreign Affairs committee that car manufacturers in the UK would have to be wound down if Britain left the EU.
In the run up to the referendum in 2016, he also said that Brexit would "eliminate" manufacturing.
Professor Minford came to prominence as a champion of Margaret Thatchers’ economic policies at time when she was under heavy attack by academics – and today he is one of the highest-profile economists in favour of Brexit.
Mr Rees-Mogg is an admirer of the professor’s work and argues he “deserves to be listened to because of his remarkable track record”.

 I seem to remember Mikhail Gorbachev saying that he had six economic advisers one of whom was a genius but he did not now which one it was.


Maybe Mr Mr Rees-Mogg  has admiration for an economist whose an Idiot. If economics is a science Professor Patrick Minford is the equivalent of a biologist advocating Intelligent Design
Concern about the future of car production in the UK is high, following warnings from Toyota, which has an engine plant in Deeside, that a no-deal Brexit could affect investment decisions. Jaguar Land Rover has warned of “tens of thousands” of jobs being at risk, and Ford, which has major operations in Bridgend, has described a no-deal outcome as "pretty disastrous".
Mr Minford now argues that the automotive sector has the potential to thrive outside the EU.
'During the 2012 hearing , Tory MP Rory Stewart asked the economist if he was talking about the “collapse of the entire UK car industry” and the “wiping out of the manufacturing industry”.According to the transcript of the committee, Mr Minford said:

“It is perfectly true that if you remove protection of the sort that has been given particularly to the car industry and other manufacturing industries inside the protective wall, you will have a change in the situation facing that industry, and you are going to have to run it down."It will be in your interests to do it, just as in the same way we ran down the coal and steel industries.“These things happen as evolution takes place in your economy. In the long run they are in your interest, but of course you have to deal with the compensation problems along the route.”
When asked about Britain’s leverage to negotiate transitional arrangements, he said:
“That is a quite good parallel. If you have an industry that is not economic, it is your interests to run it down.”
Mr Minford’s comments have now been widely shared on social media.
In the run-up to the 2016 Brexit referendum, Mr Minford wrote:
“Britain is good at putting on a suit and selling to other nations.”“A lot of what now happens in the car industry is now pretty skilled labour-intensive, and that could become more so.”....“What tends to happen is the competition that is unleashed by removing protection forces the industry to go up the value added chain, [to] more skill-intensive bits of the production process and outsource more of it..."The stuff that they are now focusing on is stuff that is really quite skill intensive, like engine manufacturing...“Obviously protection will be removed quite slowly in response to free trade agreements around the world so it won’t all happen overnight but probably, if you are looking [10 years ahead] we will see it moving up, becoming more productive really.”


He also sought to put his comments about the elimination of manufacturing into context, saying he 
He said: 

“If, for some reason, there were no willingness by the other countries’ car owners and governments to cooperate in this and there were a faster run-down of our car industry as a result of that lack of cooperation, we would have to compensate them in a way rather like the steel and coal industry...
“Over time, if we left the EU, it seems likely that we would mostly eliminate manufacturing , leaving mainly industries such as design, marketing and hi-tech. But this shouldn’t scare us.
Quite a lot of the car industry has changed quite a bit from what it was in 2012, believe it or not. It’s now very much more high value-added...
 “huge drop in the currency” has been “enormously favourable to the car industry and that’s not going to go away in a hurry”.
“meant that unskilled intensive manufacturing, you know, metal-bashing, would be eliminated” but that “the bits of manufacturing that were skill intensive would probably expand”.
“If you look at what Dyson does, for example, in this country, it’s all very skill-intensive, it’s engineering boffins trying to think of new ways of doing stuff.”
“meant that unskilled intensive manufacturing, you know, metal-bashing, would be eliminated” but that “the bits of manufacturing that were skill intensive would probably expand”.
Dyson? Well we know where Dyson stands  founder  James Dyson is a major supporter of Brexit and has just announced he is planning to open a new car plant , not in Brexit Britain.


Dyson vacuum cleaners and washing machines were made in Malmesbury, Wiltshire until 2002, when the company transferred vacuum cleaner production to Malaysia. There was some controversy over the reason for this move, as well as over plans to expand Dyson's factory to increase production. Moreover, trade unionists in Wiltshire claimed that the move would negatively impact the local economy through the loss of jobs.[31][32] The following year, washing machine production was also transferred to Malaysia. This move was driven by lower production costs in Malaysia (lower by 30% compared with the UK); however, it created a loss of 65 jobs.[34]

In 2004, the Meiban-Dyson Laundry Manufacturing Plant was launched in Johor, Malaysia. The newly opened RM10 million (approx. US$2.63 million) plant is a joint venture between Dyson and the Singapore-based Meiban Group Ltd., which has manufacturing facilities in Singapore, Malaysia and China.[35]

Dyson stated that the cost savings from transferring production to Malaysia enabled investment in research & development at their Malmesbury head office.[

In 2007, Dyson formed a partnership with the Malaysian electronics manufacturer VS Industry Bhd (VSI) to take on a major role in Dyson's supply chain, from raw material sourcing and production to distribution. VSI also undertook an extensive production plan to supply finished product to Dyson's destination markets around the globe (America, UK, Japan, etc.).

It is said that Dyson has around 7,000 employees. Dyson has not publicly stated where those employees are actually located, though it is known that VS Industry Bhd (VSI) currently has around 4,250 employees at their Malaysian facility which manufactures Dyson products,[39] and in 2007 it was reported that Dyson alone was responsible for 80% of VS Industry Bhd (VSI) revenue.[40]

Dyson launched a $360 million plant in Tuas, Singapore in 2013, which can produce 4 million digital motors a year.[41] In 2016, Dyson injected $100 million to increase the production output to an estimated 11 million digital motors a year.


At least we have the Mule giving space to Plaid Cymru Carmarthen East and Dinefwr MP Jonathan Edwards said he was alarmed but not surprised by the 2012 remarks.
He said:
“It doesn’t take an economic genius to work out that the communities that are going to lose out are Welsh communities – that’s the reality of leaving control over our economy in Westminster...
“If you look at the sort of people who have really been driving the whole Brexit agenda, their economic vision is to turn the British state and London in particular into a Singaporean-type economy. That means zero business tax, zero corporate tax, zero regulation and an economy based on high finance; in every scenario Wales loses out." 
 “The reality is if we do leave the single market and the customs union there will be a huge hit for manufacturing. The same people who took away our coal mines and our steel plants [are] now going to be pursuing the same ideological economic philosophy in the post-Brexit era.
 This is exactly what the Tories want nor just William Rees Mogg , they see themselves  raking off  a fortune for themselves in such a scenario. The rest of us will however be left to rot.

Friday, 26 October 2018

Plaid's Liz Savile Roberts speaks as Gaeilge in commons.

It may come as a bit of  a surprise that The Irish language was spoken in the House of Commons by a Welsh MP for the first time in over 100 years y on Wednesday even more so that it was by s spoken by Welsh MP Liz Saville-Roberts during a debate on the introduction as Liz Saville-Roberts, who is a graduate of Celtic studies, called on the British government to introduce legislation to protect the rights of Irish speakers.

"Is cearta daonna iad cearta teanga agus tá cothrom na féinne tuilte ag lucht labhartha na Gaeilge," she said - which translates to:
"Language rights are human rights and the Irish speaking community are entitled to equality."

She added;

 "The British government pledged to introduce an Irish language act based on the experiences of Wales and the Republic of Ireland.""Will the minister uphold this commitment by introducing an Irish Language Act if power-sharing institutions are not restored within six months?"
 "Go raibh maith agat".

Unfortunately I have ben unable to copy the video of this but you may se it here.
https://www.newstalk.com/content/000/images/000305/313161_146_news_hub_250377_677x251.jpg


It is understood that this is the first time Irish has been spoken by a sitting MP in the House of Commons since 1901.

An Irish language Act is the main obstacle preventing the Northern Ireland Assembly meting Unionist being presumably , that it would lead to a growth in people learning the language and developing greater "Nationalist" sentiments"

It is understood that this is the first time Irish has been spoken by a sitting MP in the House of Commons since 1901.

Irish Parliamentary Party MP for West Kerry Thomas O’Donnell spoke in Irish in 1901, delivering a "maiden speech", the Pall Mall Gazette reported at the time.
"Mr Thomas O’Donnell rose in the House last night to make his maiden speech, and addressed the Speaker in the Erse language.
"As a joke it was the feeblest performance that even Mr O’Donnell can have perpetrated, and by this time he ought to be consumed by his own blushes," the paper said.

Since the even after the formation of the Irish Free State there have bee numerous "Irish Nationalists"  elected to the House of Commons from Northern Ireland (despite Unionist gerrymandering ) and Liverpool Scotland was characterized by having two MPs of exceptionally long service. T.P. O'Connor served in the constituency for 44 years until his death in 1929, becoming Father of the House in 1918. It was the only constituency outside the island of Ireland ever to return an Irish Nationalist Party MP, and O'Connor continued to be re-elected in Liverpool under this label unopposed, despite the Irish Free State achieving Dominion status in 1922. 

It is strange therefore that none of these  "Irish Nationalists" MP have tried to use  Gaeilge, in HOC procedures including SDLP members.

There are no SDLP  MPs at the moment as the party has been eclipsed by  Sinn Féin , who do not take their 7 seats.

So the only voices on what after Brexit and the question of the British Boarder In Ireland is a major contentious issue , that we here in the commons come from Unionist MPs.

Liz Saville Roberts deserves huge praise , for her use of Gaeilge, in the UK parliament, showing what an exceptional politician she is . We in Wales are proud of her and she has probably one many more admirers on the other side of the Irish sea.   

Thursday, 25 October 2018

Mr Bumble the Beadle appears in the Assembly.

There have been call for Carwyn Jones to consider sacking Local Government Secretary Alun Davies after he compared councillors to Oliver Twist.
Mr Davies AM for Blaneau Gwent  told a BBC radio debate that councillors should stop "complaining", prompting an angry response from the Welsh Local Government Association.
His remarks follow calls for more council cash ahead of planned real-terms cuts to local authority budgets.
Plaid Cymru said Mr Davies' remarks were in "poor taste".
Mr Davies said: "I've had a lot of councillors coming to me like Oliver Twists over the past few weeks - 'Can we have some more?'".
I t comes as no suprise to se Mr Davies compared to Mr Bumble the fictional character in the novel Oliver Twist (1837–39) by Charles Dickens. Mr. Bumble is the cruel, pompous and ignorant beadle of the workhouse where the orphaned Oliver is raised an arrogant man, who often speaks highly about his position in lording over the "ungrateful" poor, Bumbledom, named after him, characterizes the meddlesome self-importance of the petty bureaucrat. He also is an unlikely source of comic relief, in his mangling of the English language, as well as in his incompetence, and in the cowardice he displays in the face of anyone who stands up to him, even Oliver.
You can almost see this appearing in the letters page of Private Eye.

Speaking on BBC Radio Cymru's Hawl i Holi, the minister said councillors agreed in private that the current system of 22 local authorities was unsustainable but were "unwilling to say that publicly".
The local government secretary told the programme: "Wales doesn't need 22 local authorities".
 Mr Davies said.



"I want to see change and I want this change to come from councils," he said.
"I've spoken to them privately many times where they've agreed that the current system is unsustainable, yet they're unwilling to say that publicly,"
"I've had enough of that and it has to change, so what I want to hear from councillors is no complaining."
Labour's Rob Stewart, Swansea council leader and one of the Welsh Local Government Association's two deputy leaders, said the first minister should
 "distance himself from the comments of the cabinet secretary and consider whether or not it is appropriate for him to remain in the cabinet in his current position."
"The cabinet secretary's reference to Oliver Twist reflects a lack of understanding of both English literature and local government," d.
"Is he seriously characterising himself as the 'Mr Bumble' of Welsh Government - the cruel overseer of the poorhouse?
"We make no apologies for asking for more resources from Welsh Government to save those services provided by hardworking teachers, youth workers, librarians and care workers that protect the communities of Wales."
 Dai Lloyd, local government spokesman for Plaid Cymru, called for Mr Davies to apologise.
He said:
"Comparing councillors to Oliver Twist - the starving orphan boy begging for gruel, is in incredibly poor taste and ironically makes himself look like the villainous master in the story."
The Welsh Conservatives' Mark Isherwood also compared the local government secretary to "Mr Bumble".
"Yet again the cabinet secretary puts himself in direct conflict with councils, and all he can do is patronise them,".
Of course Mr Bumble ended up sacked and reduced an poverty  forced to enterg the very workhouse he had  lorded over .

Whilst Mr Davies is unlikely to end up in this state, he should be sacked not only by the First Ministers but also by his constituents at the next election.

Wednesday, 24 October 2018

Glasgow strike: A worthy cause but not a worthy reason?



 I don't know whether the SNP council have been lax in resolving the issue of equal pay by Glasgow council, but the hypocrisy  of Labour politicians and the Trade Unions is staggering.



Hundreds of schools and nurseries in Glasgow are closed and home care services faced disruption  yesterday as council workers staged one of Britain’s biggest strikes over equal pay.

The walkout – which involves more than 8,000 workers – started at 7am on Tuesday and follows years of legal disputes between unions and Glasgow City Council (GCC) over claims that staff in female-dominated roles, such as cleaning, were underpaid.

Some women claim they made up to £3-an-hour less than those in male-dominated roles, such as bin collections. Some women are said to have been paid up to £4,000-a-year less than male counterparts.

Thousands of female workers are proceeding with claims against the council following a court of session ruling last year.

Members of the GMB and Unison unions are striking amid a “lack of progress” on equal pay claims from thousands of female workers, the unions said.

Ir received  mesages of support from major Labour leaders.

 22 hours ago22 hours ago



MoreI send my solidarity to women council workers in Glasgow who go on strike today to demand equal pay. They are the carers, cleaners and caterers who are society's unsung heroes. When they go on strike, it's our duty to support them.



So it was the Unions and the Labour party standing up to the SNP run Glasgow council on behalf of low pay workers. 

Bad SNP

Er. Not Quite.

This by Dani Garavelli  in the Scotsman, one of the few "journalists who explained the true facts about the strike.

Remember who caused mess as Glasgow women strike
It was the decision in 2006 by the then Labour administration to implement a discriminatory pay and grades structure, and the decision of later ones to oppose the women’s consequent pay claims, that created this shambles.Those decisions were facilitated (some would say driven) by male-dominated unions, including the GMB, which were all too happy to see their male workers’ pay and bonuses protected.When the SNP took control last year, it accepted the women had been underpaid and pledged to resolve the claims, even though it understood the issue would cast a shadow over its first term and potentially deprive it of a second.



It may well be true, as Action 4 Equality claims, that it is failing to deliver on that pledge. The organisation says the council officers leading the negotiations – the very same council officers who advised previous administrations not to settle – are still proving uncooperative.And yet, the SNP has achieved three major goals: it ended the court action, it brought Cordia, the arms-length organisation for homecarers , back in-house and it scrapped the discredited pay and grades scheme and replaced it with a new one.I am not cynical enough to suggest the GMB is only standing up for female members now because the SNP is in charge, though there were no equal pay strikes under Labour; I prefer to believe it has more to do with the fact that the union now has two women – Rhea Wolfson (the Labour candidate for Livingston) and Hazel Nolan – as regional organisers.In any case, it would be a strange thing to criticise a trade union for finally doing its job. But I do think some humility on the part of both the GMB and Unison, which was also slow to offer support, would be welcome. As for those Labour politicians attacking the SNP administration over equal pay: they are shameless and must take us all for fools. Do they really think our attention spans are so short?

 Not everybody was prepared to be as generous as Ms Garavelli 

  1. Complete coincidence that the GMB organisers of are Labour candidates who were stony silent during this. No gleeful excitement to help women gain their rightful pay then. This strike is shameless opportunism.
  2. Furthermore, it’s downright rude & dismissive (as well as unhelpful to Labour) to label all Scottish people with a genuine grievance against a Labour council who fought ruthlessly to deny women equal pay as “Scottish trolls”.



The Unions seem to think that at times they are there to support the Labour Party, rather than their members .

Yesterday's strike may have been for a worthy cause , but it seems that it was not for a worthy reason.

Tuesday, 23 October 2018

Unfortunately Corbynists were missing on Saturday and, Blarites were there .

I have just been reading the Blog Left Foot in the Mouth Left Foot Forward on which has 

Five thoughts on Saturday’s massive march for a People’s Vote.

It's rather disappointing the writer Josiah Mortimer seems to be confused

1. This wasn’t about a People’s Vote
I spoke to nearly a dozen protesters on the day. Surprisingly, nearly all of them said they didn’t think a ‘People’s Vote’ was now possible – either there wasn’t enough time, or ‘it’s not going to happen’ regardless.
Instead, this was a show of force for pro-Europeans. One marcher, Will, told me he was there to ‘change the terms of the Brexit debate’. Another, Paolo, said it was because the EU was ‘part of [his] identity’. Most others I spoke to were there to show that public opinion is shifting – and to make Theresa May listen to their concerns amid hard-right lobbying.
I suspect many who marched on Saturday had taken part in demonstrations in the past, Stop the War, for example and there ma have been a fair smattering of CND veterans, in which few taking part would have expected to achieve their desires. The major difference  seems to be the absence of leaders of the Labour "Left"

2. This could be a turning point

Despite that, the sheer scale of the march suggests this is a movement which has galvanised a broad swathe of people. It feels the Brexit debate has moved on: from what was previously a conversation about hard vs soft Brexit – to now being about hard Brexit vs stopping Brexit altogether.Labour’s ‘tests’ on what circumstances would mean they’d vote for Theresa May’s Brexit deal no longer seem pertinent (the party are likely to vote down her deal regardless).The real question is ‘what’s next’ if May’s deal is rejected. That puts the arguments of the People’s Vote campaign at the foreground.
So it was about a Peoples Vote! The question is who was it aimed at the Tory Government or the lLabour opposition.

3. “Where’s Jeremy Corbyn?”

There was radio silence from the Labour frontbench regarding Saturday’s march. This is tactically wise within the confines of Labour’s current position. Of course Jeremy was not going to back the demonstration – moving straight to a People’s Vote is contrary to Labour’s policy. And endorsing it risks alienating large sections of the Labour vote.The current fudge is proving a tactical necessity. As Best for Britain chief Eloise Todd told me last week, ‘the job of any opposition is to want to have an election’ over another referendum. That makes it totally understandable that frontbenchers were tight-lipped on the day of the demo.
This is utter rubbish the job of the opposition is to scrutinise the government highlight their  an alternative and try and change polcies between . If this leads to the opportunity to bring the government down then they should take it, but if the goverment have a substantial majority then they must work in that enviroment.

4. Where were the anti-Brexit Corbynistas?

The pertinent question for the left isn’t ‘where was Corbyn’ – but why there were no Corbyn supporters speaking on the day.
There were plenty of placards from Another Europe is Possible – the left-wing campaign against Brexit. Yet the main stage was fairly devoid of ‘true’ left-wingers other than Caroline Lucas. While Sadiq Khan is respected among progressives, the London Mayor’s past anti-Corbyn statements means he will fail to sway much of the party’s grassroots.
One senior anti-Brexit Corbyn supporter told me it was a ‘grey area’ as to whether Corbynistas were invited to speak. Whatever the case, if the People’s Vote want to sway the leadership, they’ll have to sway the unions and party grassroots. That means ramping up the profile of anti-Brexit socialists.
While there were plenty of popular celebrities featured at the demo – from Delia Smith to Gary Lineker – the prominence of figures like Chuka Umunna (who recently disgruntled Corbyn-supporters by calling Labour ‘institutionally racist’), as well as New Labour dons like Alistair Campbell, might not be doing the movement favours.
Some Corbynists  and Lexiters (Left wing supporters of Corbyn)  have  attacked the marchers and speakers  for containing Blarites , they seem to forget , that this march was not about Labour unity but consisted of members of other parties , including a highlight video contribution of Scotland's First Minister.Nicola Sturgeon. I would respect Corbyn and Lexiters in his party more if they said they backed a Hard Brexit. Instead they seem content to let the Tories get on with the potential catastrophe they are making in the hope that a socialist utopia will rise from the ashes.

Many like myself are uncomfortable with ticking "Like " boxes on social media in messages from Alistair Campbell, Lord Adonis and other Blarites , but how many Corbynists can I find who attack the Tory Brexit plans.

5. Beyond the bubble

I also asked marchers if they knew anyone who had voted leave who had now changed their minds. The answer was almost universally a long pause, followed by ‘I know of people who have’.
The Remain campaign – and its arguments – appear to be locked within a certain 2016 time-warp: similar figures repeating similar arguments to a similar group of people. That is not to say the arguments are wrong – they just won’t convince current Leavers.
The response I got to this (from two marchers I spoke to) was that then-16 and 17 year olds were now of voting age, and ‘older voters are dying off’. This is the same argument that persuaded the US and the world that Donald Trump could not possibly win. It’s not demographics, stupid – it’s politics.
One marcher told me people voted to leave out of ‘frustration’ and disinformation (‘so much rubbish’). That may be so – but that frustration and alienation with politics has not gone away. Indeed, it may only increase if people feel ‘betrayed’ or that an elite are trying to override democracy.
Nor have the rules of campaigns been updated to avert the risk of more (not less) disinformation and foreign influence taking place next time. As one marcher told me, ‘if the vote happened again, it [the result] would be the same’.
Saturday’s march was impressive and has galvanised the anti-Brexit cause. Now the focus must be on honing the arguments – and getting the right messengers – to ensure the movement is not just a liberal love-in.
It is time to move on from the arguments of 2016. It is not enough to say ‘voters were lied to’ or ‘older voters are dying off’. We have to win the argument on how people feel about Europe. That will take a lot more work.
OK Mortimer final point may be right in that voters are still evenly split and Leavers are not drifting to Remain in their masses , but some of the Blame here must surly with  the opposition cabinet , at times it seems at PMQ's , the main opposition speaker is the SNP's Ian Blackford, even if Corbyn supports Brexit he should be putting a case that the Tories are making a complete Balls Up of it.